<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Abner Stories &#187; iPhone seccurity unlock AT&amp;T Mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securitystory.com/tag/iphone-seccurity-unlock-att-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securitystory.com</link>
	<description>Abner Germanow's Musings on Communications, Economics, and Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 06:06:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Control the client vs control the traffic &#8211; the iPhone points to an expensive inflection point</title>
		<link>http://securitystory.com/2009/07/control-the-client-vs-control-the-traffic-the-iphone-points-to-an-expensive-inflection-point/</link>
		<comments>http://securitystory.com/2009/07/control-the-client-vs-control-the-traffic-the-iphone-points-to-an-expensive-inflection-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Abner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone seccurity unlock AT&T Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitystory.com/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Client issues still plague enterprise WLANs and a host of other network problems. Client devices are wonky, built on razor thin margins, and can proliferate widely with few controls. IDC&#8217;s VP of Security research, Chris Christiansen calls this problem &#8220;managing the unmanageble.&#8221; 
The ability for a network owner of any sort to control a client [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Client issues still plague enterprise WLANs and a host of other network problems. Client devices are wonky, built on razor thin margins, and can proliferate widely with few controls. IDC&#8217;s VP of Security research, <a href="http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=PRF000063">Chris Christiansen</a> calls this problem &#8220;managing the unmanageble.&#8221; </p>
<p>The ability for a network owner of any sort to control a client is on a long downhill slide. (Play tape of explosion in the Internet of Things, BYO PCs, etc) Fortunately, the ability for a network owner to monitor, shape, and control the traffic on the network is rising as the cost of cracking a packet declines. The problem is we won&#8217;t get there fast enough &#8211; especially at the edge of the network. </p>
<p>As evidenced by the outrage in this <a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/07/29/is-the-iphone-causing-apple-to-lose-the-plot/">Techcrunch post on Apple and AT&#038;T&#8217;s struggles</a> handling the incredible traffic generated by iPhones, we are currently facing a bit of a nasty inflection point. Devices are now officially too hard to control, while it is still too expensive to apply the level of intelligence in the network needed to let go. </p>
<p>Your thoughts?</p>
<p>* Hacking the iPhone has a long history and while I was the <a href="/archives/000127.html">first to point out it was an issue</a> (horn toot), I&#8217;m wondering if any iPhone app developers have been asked to change their app based on the type of and volume of network traffic the app generates. Bueller? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://securitystory.com/2009/07/control-the-client-vs-control-the-traffic-the-iphone-points-to-an-expensive-inflection-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Technology Fails, Try Process: iPhone instore activation</title>
		<link>http://securitystory.com/2008/06/when-technology-fails-try-process-iphone-instore-activation/</link>
		<comments>http://securitystory.com/2008/06/when-technology-fails-try-process-iphone-instore-activation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Abner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone seccurity unlock AT&T Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitystory.com/WP/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the iPhone OS wasn&#8217;t up to the task of thwarting the haxor community, Apple is taking (being forced by AT&#38;T?) the step of forcing customers to activate AT&#38;T service at purchase.
Given the length of time it took to unlock the iPhone I (3 months) it appears Apple did a decent job attempting to secure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the iPhone OS wasn&#8217;t up to the task of <a href="/archives/000127.html">thwarting the haxor community</a>, Apple is taking (being forced by AT&amp;T?) the step of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/09/iphone-3g-purchase-and-activation-will-be-in-store-only/">forcing customers to activate AT&amp;T service at purchase</a>.</p>
<p>Given the length of time it took to unlock the iPhone I (3 months) it appears Apple did a decent job attempting to secure the iPhone SIM. Despite that, someone at either Apple or AT&amp;T is convinced they lost out on revenue from iPhones that were purchased and then unlocked and used on other carriers or even as wifi only devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://securitystory.com/2008/06/when-technology-fails-try-process-iphone-instore-activation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
